![space meteorite space meteorite](https://cdnph.upi.com/sv/ph/og/upi/11341253293345/2009/1/55b0b437eb5302a30be6a5eca9815565/v1.5/Camera-tracks-meteorite-to-home-in-space.jpg)
Some look caramelized- as if wilted by heat.
![space meteorite space meteorite](https://www.cloudynights.com/uploads/monthly_08_2018/post-99073-0-45319200-1535744619.jpg)
They are clear, to blue-green tubal structures with bulbs on the end of some fibers. Over the course of examining different specimens taken from the meteorite, it became apparent that indeed there are hair-like fibers in the metal. I advised her to get an XRay diffraction test to go about this property. The resolution was to low to see properly at that size. What was also observed by myself was the unique five-sided metal structure, maybe 20. But as my previous research had shown, the composition of the metal was a perfect candidate for a quasicrystal metal. That night Tanya and I agreed that it was a meteorite and that it contained diamond, and nanodiamond as were observed in my examination. In short, they have been researched for their proposed superconductive properties highly desirable to my magnet piston engine.
#SPACE METEORITE SERIES#
Through a series of previous crossing subjects of research, I was exposed to nanomaterial science, along with superconductive theory which intersects the on the subjects of nanocrystalline materials and their theory. She gifted my daughter a piece and I began my research. This was first relayed to me just before my daughter's birthday so about January 25th. She also reported "hairs" on the surface growing from the metal. She also noticed that this was a self magnetizing metal. She noticed gems in the specimens that she had cut from the main 2-ton body. Tanya has a very low nickel content in the meteorite metal. She had done research and testing and had concluded that she had a meteorite she is the sole owner of. My name is Brian, I was contacted through a mutual friend for Tanya Schexnayder. This Record is written to log events for scientific and historical purposes. Here is what one of the scientists wrote and gave to me: And the WEIGHT, you really do not know what you might have there. One starting place could be the guys who look out for asteroids. You really have to get an expert opinion. Stony irons are rare because they are thought to come from the boundary between the outside of the asteroid and the core. Not so many are found because they look just like stones (which they are). Ordinary stony mets (meteorites) are from the outside of the asteroid and relatively common. As you know, meteorites are thought to be broken asteroids, probably through collisions. It just so happens I have been an asteroid fan for years. SORRY - you don't sound like you would sign anything.Īn average chemist isn't going to make a lot of it. You have to get a real expert on this - and don't sell it yet or sign anything. The last analysis would make sense if it were iron nickel meteorite only but the first analysis suggests iron-nickel only about half, The teardrop part is the front as it came through the atmosphere. "and no there isn't a lot of black on the very bottom towards the teardrop part of it there is blackish"